IBASICS
Which is the best browser alternative to Safari?
Michel Munger
LOW END MAC
The Macintosh platform is blessed with a great selection of browsers. Safari is nice, but it comes with one annoying limitation to many of us. You have to buy a US$129 system upgrade when you want to make the jump to a new version.
There are many other free or inexpensive products that do a great job and could be used on a regular basis, but which is right for whom? Let’s find out. Internet Explorer has been left out of this article because Microsoft is not involved in the Mac browser business anymore. Netscape and the full Mozilla suite have also been left out because all their releases are now based on Firefox.
FREE BROWSERS
Mozilla Firefox
If you liked Netscape a few years ago, Mozilla Firefox could be your favorite today. It now is the flagship browser of the Mozilla Foundation and successor to the venerable Netscape Navigator. Its menu structure and preferences boxes are based on Netscape’s, but the browser itself has evolved a lot.
Firefox is mostly a simple well-thought-of browser. It offers tabbed browsing, password management, a highly customizable interface, strong security, and a great implementation of Web standards. When other browsers are not allowed to access a site that requires forms or secure connections, Firefox usually does the job.
It comes short if you compare its feature set the competition, and it launches slowly because it loads its Mac interface independently from the system’s resources. However, its robustness, its compatibility, its RSS support and its clean looks with Tiger’s unified bars make it a breeze to use.
A major advantage: its swift open source development make it a mainstream browser that evolves very quickly… for free. The developers update it quickly to patch security holes, most of the time before they are even exploited.
What makes Firefox attractive is that every feature seems to be implemented the right way by a bunch of perfectionists. In example: the Find function is nicely located at the bottom of the browser window, making it subtler than a window that pops in your face. You can keep it permanently if you wish, and it won’t get in the way.
As far as the interface is concerned, what I appreciate is the extra space between buttons and other elements to make everything easier to the eye. A minor complaint, however: it does not use Mac OS X’s widgets for submit buttons and checkboxes in Web forms.
What separates Firefox from the pack in terms of customization is the Extensions feature. It allows anybody to create and use other people’s custom features.
Firefox is also available on more platforms (Mac, Windows, Linux and many others) making it a good choice for those of us who want the same setup in different environments. Not only is it cross-platform, but it also is available in more languages than any other. This is great for those who want to use it in languages that are not widely supported.
Mozilla Camino
You can consider Camino to be Firefox’s little cousin on the Mac side. Developed by the Mozilla Foundation, it is free Mac-only product coded in Cocoa, the best programming environment to use in order to fully take advantage of Mac OS X’s features.
For the most part, Camino works like Firefox, but it has a better Mac-like look and feel, and it is a bit lighter and faster.
The big drawback is that Camino’s development pace can be fast at times and sluggish later. You can wait several months for an update while competitors will at least release security updates every few weeks.
COMMERCIAL BROWSERS
Opera
The next option is Opera, and it is a monster. Every browser has strengths but this one gathers them all. Among the browsers I tested, Opera packs more features than any other, and it seems to be the fastest.
I would even label it a heavy-duty, professional browser. It allows users to tweak and personalize it through an extensive set of preferences, and it is robust enough to sustain long browsing sessions without slowing down.
Advanced features include saving sessions. Opera saves all open pages to resume the session later. This acts as a nice complement to the browser history, especially to shorten browsing time.
By pulling down the Quick Preferences menu, you can identify Opera as itself, Mozilla or Internet Explorer. You can also tailor your controls for pop-up windows, Javascript and cookies, among other things.
As for other browser developers, the folks at Opera offer now-standard features such as tabbed browsing, menu bar elements to differentiate secure from non-secure pages, password management, forms autofill, RSS feeds support, etc.
My favorite feature would probably be the full screen mode. When you turn this on, the browser takes the whole screen, which is handy when you want to focus on reading an article or view a movie site, or simply give the browser more screen space to view a large page. I never understood why most Mac browsers overlooked this functionality.
Click on the image for full size
None of the features mentioned above is necessarily groundbreaking or spectacular. What makes Opera special is that it gathers them all in one package.
My only gripes are about site compatibility. Opera was the only browser that was unable to log in at my banking site or my job’s Microsoft Outlook Web access, and it was the only one to display a few pages incorrectly. The folks at Opera said, in example, that the Outlook server software required an upgrade in order to work with Opera, but I can imagine the laughs from the guys at the office’s IT department if I told them to upgrade their server for one user who wants to check his e-mail when he’s out of the office. They’ll tell me to use another browser, simply. Such are the realities of the real world, and this is a weakness for Opera. When you have to pay for it, it makes you think twice before buying it.
Such complaints aside, Opera is a complete package for professional browsing needs. You can download it for free, and if it works well enough for you, it costs US$39 to get rid of the advertising and access premium support.
OmniWeb
How to describe OmniWeb? It probably is the most Mac-like browser on the market. The feature set is pretty complete, and its interface really feels like it was designed for Mac OS X.
One of OmniWeb’s top features is called Workspaces. It saves sessions – Opera also does this – but its session management interface is more detailed. This kind of feature is great for those who need to access a certain set of Web sites at the same time, as I often do at work. It also makes it easier to resume a session if the browser crashes.
My favorite feature in OmniWeb is the ability to customize the site preferences. OmniWeb keeps prefs for just every Web site, so you can change settings for appearance, security and ad blocking. Every site will behave the way you want it to, and that is very neat. No other browser gives you that much control over each site.
I do have a big complaint, however: OmniWeb’s performance in terms of page rendering seems sluggish. In fact, it was the slowest among all my browsers with my favorite sites, and the application itself could be more responsive. The Workspaces feature can save you time, but the page rendering can make you waste time. Given the fact that OmniWeb costs US$29.95, I find this unacceptable.
Conclusion
My recommendation? Mozilla Firefox is the best all-around browser. It always free while new Safari versions come with expensive system upgrades. Unlike Camino, Safari and OmniWeb, it is also available on other platforms. Although it lacks some of Opera’s features, it provides better compatibility with Web sites. It is a photo-finish, and in my opinion, Firefox wins by a nose.
Links:







































